HRMNY Pilot Programme
Transforming Statutory Assessments in Three Stages
Who Should Join the HRMNY Pilot?
Local Authorities
DoLS/LPS
Care Act assessments
Safeguarding and Mental Capacity pathways
Quality, performance, and compliance oversight
NHS Organisations
Mental Health Trusts
Community Health Teams
Integrated Care Boards (ICBs)
Continuing Healthcare (CHC) teams
Hospital discharge and flow services
Assessment Professionals
BIAs and AMCPs
Section 12 doctors
Social workers and Care Act assessors
SEND case officers
Court of Protection practitioners
Mental Health act
Government Bodies: Regulators & System Leaders
For organisations seeking real time assurance, auditability, and visibility of statutory pathways. I,e, Charities, CQC.
HRMNY provides transparent, end to end data on process times, bottlenecks, and compliance
Care Providers
For care homes, supported living services, and hospital wards acting as Managing Authorities.
HRMNY reduces referral errors, speeds up communication, and ensures safer, faster authorisations.
The Pilot Stages in Details
Stage 1
Scenario Testing
Stage 1 proved that HRMNY can run a complete statutory assessment pathway end‑to‑end, safely and consistently, with every stakeholder involved:
Managing Authorities
Supervisory Bodies
BIAs / AMCPs
Section 12 doctors
Administrative teams
Using real (anonymised) referrals, assessors completed each stage of the digital workflow inside Hrmny. System-generated audit logs captured every handover and action, allowing us to evaluate where the digital pathway removed duplication, reduced delays, and clarified responsibilities. Importantly, Stage One focused on workflow mechanics and system behaviour, not clinical decision making or the time required to complete full assessments. BIAs and s12 doctors did not undertake visits, interviews, or full Form 3 or Form 4 writing during this pilot. This was intentional, ensuring we could observe the entire workflow within a single test environment.
Platform findings support assessors during real assessments (prompts, structure, legal guardrails)
Using full scenario tests and timestamped evidence, practitioners validated every step of the workflow.
Traditional manual effort per DoLS case 10.5 hours – Vs HRMNY 25.5 minutes
99.7% – Reduction in elapsed waiting time in Stage One
£637.6m – Estimated annual savings
These figures are grounded in testbed audit logs, national DoLS data, and a conservative model – proven, not promised.
The findings indicate that Hrmny can provide a cleaner, safer, and more auditable pathway between agencies, with reduced back-and-forth communication and clearer decision tracking. These results give a strong foundation for Stage Two, where Hrmny will use live caseloads, including full assessment writing, real elapsed-time measurement, and quality indicators.
Stage 1 confirmed that HRMNY is safe, lawful, and ready for real‑world deployment.
Stage 2
Real Assessment Time
Stage 2 moves beyond controlled scenarios and into real assessment work, running side by side with assessors’ existing methods.
Stage 3
Interoperability & System Level Impact (Q1 2026)
Stage 3 unlocks the full system wide benefits of HRMNY by enabling interoperability with existing case management systems that currently cannot communicate with one another.
Stage 3 unlocks full interoperability between HRMNY and existing case-management systems that currently cannot talk to each other.
This phase will:
Pull relevant data safely from legacy systems into HRMNY
Reduce manual re-entry across MA/SB teams
Dramatically cut supervisory body and managing authority workloads
Improve legal defensibility through consistent audit trails and complete documentation
Provide councils with live reporting and performance dashboards
Offer the CQC real-time assurance on process times, bottlenecks and risk
Run real time annual reports , automated on system
Payroll, independent assessors
We expect Stage 3 alone to save thousands of hours across councils and MA/SB teams every year.
Join the Cohort
We are seeking forward thinking managers and senior leaders from local authorities and NHS organisations to join the cohort
What Our Clients Say
SB / Head of Safeguarding
I can see the time, effort and money this would save at SB. The Separate approver keeps us right, and once a case hits SB the decision is done in a minute.
MA
Having QA built in really reduced the back and forth. I get comments on the exact fields that need changing, so I am not re-reading a whole form to fix one thing.
BIA
It’s simple. Easy to use. It felt straightforward. I could pick it up, finish my notes and keep a case moving from home.